David Johnson scripsit:
> But such is not the case for a web application. The software will only be
> copied to the legal owner's servers, and the only thing the user receives is
> the output of the program, not the program itself.
There is the question of whether the HTML generated by the program is
a derivative work of the program, which depends on how the program is
implemented. If so, then OtherCo has surely copied *and distributed* it.
The trouble is that there are so few people who understand the law
and Open Source both.
--
John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore
--Douglas Hofstadter
- Re: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' Karsten M. Self
- Re: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' David Johnson
- RE: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
- Re: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' John Cowan
- Re: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' David Johnson
- Re: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' Karsten M. Self
- Re: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' David Johnson
- Re: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' phil hunt
- Re: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' Brian Behlendorf
- RE: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' SamBC
- Re: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' John Cowan
- Re: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' David Johnson
- Re: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' Blake Cretney
- RE: GPLv2 'web-app loophole' Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.

