Rick Moen wrote: > I'm sure views will differ as to whether compelling > disclosure of private work _should_ be seen as in > the intended spirit of the OSD. such disclosure should be viewed in the same light as license that forces all modifications be sent to the original author. in short, dimly viewed upon. The Bazaar-Nazi's on the list may have something else to say about it though... I.M.H.O. I.A.N.A.L. M.O.U.S.E. Greg -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
- GPL vs APSL (was: YAPL is bad) John Cowan
- Re: GPL vs APSL (was: YAPL is bad) Greg London
- Re: GPL vs APSL (was: YAPL is bad) Greg London
- Re: GPL vs APSL (was: YAPL is bad) Rick Moen
- Re: GPL vs APSL (was: YAPL is bad) Greg London
- Re: GPL vs APSL (was: YAPL is bad) David Johnson
- Re: GPL vs APSL (was: YAPL is bad) Greg London
- Re: GPL vs APSL (was: YAPL is bad) Rick Moen
- Re: GPL vs APSL (was: YAPL is bad) John Cowan
- RE: GPL vs APSL (was: YAPL is bad) Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.

