Karsten M. Self writes: > - Ensure that sources are distributable. Not only distributable, but also available.
Sigh. Last time I sat down to rewrite #2, I ended up concluding that we really need to have *two* OSD's: one describing source code, and another describing the distribution of a special type of derived work created through mechanical means from source code which is also not only licensed under an Open Source license, but which is also actually available. Phwew! Started this posting with only three periods left in the type tray, and I managed to complete it using just those three! -- -russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | It's a crime, not an act 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | of war. For my take, see: Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | http://quaker.org/crime.html -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
