Ned Lilly writes: > Is anyone aware of a license which permits source access and > modifications, patch contributions, but restricts the right to > distribute compiled binaries to the sponsoring organization?
A binary is a derived work. An open source license has to allow distribution of binaries. That's not to say that you can't create a Source-Available license which prohibited binary distribution, but it wouldn't be Open Source, and we wouldn't certify it. -- -russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | It's a crime, not an act 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | of war. For my take, see: Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | http://quaker.org/crime.html -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
