Hello,
A portuguese company, MrNet, is advertising an "opensource" product, and flags a
certain license [ http://www.siteseed.org/ ] as opensource.
A quick inspection reveals that the first 8 of the 9 points of the open source
definition are almost completely disregarded, and the last one is simply addressed by
omission.
I have posted in a public forum in portuguese my problems with that misleading
license, but I think it should be addressed by someone from the opensource initiative
as well.
In my point of view, this license is intentionally misleading to lead the most
gullible into thinking they're using opensource software.
What can be done more to this effect?
Best wishes,
rms
PGP signature
