Bruce Perens scripsit: > I haven't read the decision in MAI vs Peak,
In brief: it said that a computer maintenance company (neither owner nor licensee) couldn't run proprietary OS software, already installed, for hardware testing purposes, because that involved making copies; the 117 safe harbor is only for owners. The part of the DCMA that overrode this is not being reviewed. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please leave your values | Check your assumptions. In fact, at the front desk. | check your assumptions at the door. --sign in Paris hotel | --Miles Vorkosigan -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
