David Johnson wrote:
>In the case of the GPL, and most other OSS licenses, I >>can completely ignore the 
>license, place a full page ad >in the NYT saying "I Disagree", get an official 
>judicial >decree that I have not agreed, and STILL be able to use >the software under 
>the terms of copyright law.

David, you're saying that, fundamentally, open-source licensing simply doesn't work 
under US law.  I don't understand why you think that you can get a judge to declare 
that you may simply disregard the license.  Would you please explain why you think 
that?  How did you reach a conclusion like that?  

Noel


-----Original Message-----
From: David Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 PM
To: John Cowan
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OSD compliant shareware


On Thursday 15 November 2001 07:15 am, John Cowan wrote:

> > Just because some license declares that I have agreed to it does
> > not make it so.
>
> In the case of the GPL, it says "If you agree to these rules, you may do
> these things.  If you don't agree, you are not bound, but you can't do
> them anyway (because of the copyright law)."

In the case of the GPL, and most other OSS licenses, I can completely ignore 
the license, place a full page ad in the NYT saying "I Disagree", get an 
official judicial decree that I have not agreed, and STILL be able to use the 
software under the terms of copyright law.

Compare this to the typical proprietary license that unilaterally imposes 
terms of use that remove rights granted to the user by law.

-- 
David Johnson
___________________
http://www.usermode.org
pgp public key on website
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3

The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and 
confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message may be an 
attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and 
confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent 
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, 
distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the 
original message. 


--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3

Reply via email to