On Sunday 09 December 2001 10:32 pm, Michael Rice wrote: > ... That is to say that > the only interaction between my product and the GPL/LGPL would be with HTTP > over a socket? I have a system that I'm thinking about putting under the > LGPL that would consist only of socket calls (no comments about weird app > design, please). Would it be considered derived if, say less than 25% of > the functionality of the non open source product came from the open source > web server? What if more than 50%? Or is it even a question of percents?
The answer to "is a socket connection a derived work" is no. Anyone who says differently is smoking dope. The border between derivative and non-derivative works can be fuzzy and ill defined at time. The FSF seems to operate under the assumption that dependency creates derivation, and considers dynamic linkage to be a case of derivation. But even they do not consider runtime linkage to be derivation. Of course, if you release a non-GPL product that is dependent upon a GPL product, even if it is only through communication over a socket, there will still be hordes of folks telling you that you have violated the sacred license. Expect to be tarred, feathered, drawn, quartered and emasculated on Spazdot the minute you do so. -- David Johnson ___________________ http://www.usermode.org pgp public key on website -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
