"Forrest J. Cavalier III" wrote: > There are two ways that I see trademark clauses written > in licenses. As I read the GPL, trademark protection clauses > as a condition of license are not GPL compatible. But > trademark warning statements along the lines of "Nothing in this license > gives you...." don't seem to impose a further restriction, > and therefore are GPL compatible, in my understanding. >
That's also the message I'm getting from the FSF at the moment (more specifically, from Bradley M. Kuhn). Regards Chris -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
