So, is the algorithm patented as well as copyrighted? If so, I think another can of worms is about to have the top popped off.
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Randy Kramer wrote: > Michael Bauer wrote: > > I don't think copyright protects an algorithm. I think you'd need a > > patent for that. So, I don't think you can license an algorithm. Of > > course, IANAL (just anal). > > Michael, > > LOL! > > You can license something that is patented, thus, if an algorithm is > patented, it could be licensed. > > IAMAL also. > > Randy Kramer > -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Michael Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.michaelbauer.com -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
