> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Gray > Subject: Re: NCSA Open Source License > > I don't think they need to create a separate ``trademark > license''. They just need to make sure that anyone who might > consider releasing a product based on Apache is not entitled > to use the Apache name: this is what we did on > <URL:http://wonka.acunia.com/licence.html>, > and both our legal dept. and FSF[1] are happy with that.
Certainly nobody *needs* to create a trademark license. And they *should* tell licensees that the license does not include the trademark. What I was saying is that they can't simply license their trademark, in a general license available to all, for use on derivative works. /Larry Rosen -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
