On Monday 04 February 2002 07:45 am, Jüri Kaljundi wrote: > ... > (http://www.amphora.ee/freeware/) is currently licensed under Mozilla type > license... > > What we would like to do is to make potentially the free Amphora Light > license a bit more relaxed, and for that we have considered starting to use > the GPL License for the freeware version.
The GPL is more relaxed than a Mozilla type license? What exactly do you mean by "relaxed?" Or is your Mozilla type license not really Mozilla like? I usually classify licenses as strong copyleft (strict), weak copyleft (somewhat relaxed), and unrestricted (very relaxed). The GPL fits in the first category and the MPL in the second. -- David Johnson ___________________ http://www.usermode.org pgp public key on website -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
