(My addressbook appears to be acting up, so I *think* this message only went to license-discuss-subscribe... hopefully you haven't seen this message yet)
Section 2: There is a thorny issue about fonts. While fonts are clearly not part of the program if distributed separately, it is difficult to say that they are not part of the program when they are so distributed. If they are part of the program, then this section runs afoul (IMO) of #1, "shall not restrict any party from selling . . . the software". I think the fonts should be in a separate package differently licensed, with all references to them excised from this license. Section 2: it is somewhat inaccurate to say that this license is an X11/MIT flavored license when it requires that modifications to existing methods or the VM be released under the license of Exhibit A. It is also appears trivial to get around, by first sub-licensing a modified version (say that *adds* a method) under a different license, and then from there modify the existing methods and VM. That is, unless that clause falls under being "no less protective of Apple," which perhaps others can comment on (it doesn't seem to be clause protecting Apple, so it doesn't seem like it should necessarily be carried over). Section 6: I'm pretty sure that's a no-no, at least under OSD#5. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3