On Tuesday, February 26, 2002, at 08:03 p, David Johnson wrote: > I've always that that this list was to discuss licenses > informally, not to be the main clearinghouse for license approval.
It is. On the other hand, it is worth pointing out that a license was recently tabled because there was too much disagreement on this list over how Open Source Fresh(notm) it was, so perhaps this list is being accorded more respect than it was in days past. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
