On Thursday 28 February 2002 03:38 am, Gerjon de Vries wrote: > Hence we are striving for a license that allows: > - Use of the library as open source (e.g. in the GPL kind of way; NOT > LGPL). So derivative works should be open source, free, and copyleft again. > - Use of the library in commercial products, in a way that assures that the > commercial product itself can not be used as a developers tool that > competes with our product. E.g. it does not include any source code, its > license forbids adaptation and/or reselling, etc.
It sounds like a dual license may meet your needs. Checkout the GPL/QPL dual license that Trolltech uses for Qt. You might also consider a dual GPL/MPL, or even a straight MPL. -- David Johnson ___________________ http://www.usermode.org pgp public key on website -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
