Emiliano writes: > A: accepts license, tells B: > 1. download tarball > 2. do "tr a-mn-z n-za-m <tarball.tar.gz | tar xpf -" > > Has A violated the license? That would seem weird, because it pertains > clear written instructions (even if those instructions are in fact a > shell script). And since B didn't agree to anything, he isn't bound by > the 'click-wrap' license.
The dragon attacks: Ask your lawyer to include terms in the license that prohibit disclosure of the unpacking method. The license will also have to prohibit distribution of the enclosed tarball. -- -russ nelson http://russnelson.com | Crypto without a threat Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | model is like cookies 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | without milk. Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
