On Wednesday 13 March 2002 10:40 pm, Forrest J. Cavalier III wrote: > I just want to point out that there is one license > already approved which has a "public performance" > clause like Bruce gave as an example.. > > The OSI approved the APSL, with clauses 2.2c-d, which require > publication of sources upon "deployment."
You don't have the APSL quite right. Clause 2.2d only applies to "Your Deployed Modifications." Clause 2.2d merely requires a prominent notice of the license for binary only deployments. It can only be triggered by the creation of a derivative work, since compilation is considered derivation. -- David Johnson ___________________ http://www.usermode.org pgp public key on website -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
