This is pretty interesting. What hooks are you speaking of? Ken Brown
-----Original Message----- From: Ed Sutter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 7:57 AM To: David Christensen Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC. MICROMONITOR SOFTWARE PUBLIC LICENSE AGREEMENT David, I don't know. My primary concern for this source code was that it be made available to the public with minimal hooks back into Lucent. As an employee, I can only do what the company allows me to do, and this is what they gave me permission to do. I think it's about as relaxed as it can get; however, I do not know if it has been approved by any other organization. If you have questions about this kind of stuff, your best bet would be to contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ed Sutter David Christensen wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > 1. Is the LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC. MICROMONITOR SOFTWARE PUBLIC LICENSE > AGREEMENT approved by the Open Source Initiative? > > 2. Is there a list of licenses that have been rejected (with reasons > why)? > > David > -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
