> I appeal to everyone in this discussion to resist and reject the use > of the propaganda term "intellectual property" to label the topic now
??? - Nobody used it this way. > under discussion. It is more clear, and less biased, to describe the > topic as "copyright and patents". The topic is more specific: some analysis of the licensing protection scheme and its compatibility with the actual definition of "software work", under Berna (and National Copyright Laws). > A discussion that uses the term "intellectual property" is likely to > embody that bias as a premise. I don't have time to study the long It appears clearly you did not follow the thread. [I.R.Maturana -- Trad En>[ES<>FR] - http://www.in3activa.org ] -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
