on Tue, Mar 19, 2002, Asko Kauppi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Hi, license freaks! :) > > I'm having some problem finding my way through the Open Source lincense > jungle. I do understand GPL and LGPL but would need something that also > allows statical linking to proprietary applications. What would you > recommend?
A BSD/MIT style license does this, though your interest in the GPL / LGPL licenses may indicate terms of BSD/MIT aren't acceptable. Alternatively, there are various dual-licensing schemes you might care to look at. Remember that as the author of a work, you don't need to seek permissions from another party to publish it. However, if you incorporate others' works in your own, you're bound by their terms. IANAL, TINLA, YADA. -- Karsten M. Self <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/ What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? Keep software free. Oppose the CBDTPA. Kill S.2048 dead. http://www.eff.org/alerts/20020322_eff_cbdtpa_alert.html
msg04846/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
