So far there have been no comments on the list since I submitted this template for approval. I have tried to address the concerns raised in the previous discussions ("copyleft lite?" and "simple copyleft...") Perhaps those who had suggestions for the previous versions could tell me whether I addressed their concerns adequately, and whether they see any new shortcomings in the current revision?
Several of the comments from the previous iterations revolved around the question of GPL compatibility. To make sure I got that right, I sent a copy of the template over to the folks at FSF. They confirmed that, when the "GNU Copyleft" provision is included, a license created from this template is GPL compatible. So, that question is now put to rest and we can focus on the other aspects of the license, such as its ability to stand on its own. Regards, Bruce ----- Original Message ----- From: "Russell Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [ Please discuss this license. This version is different from earlier > versions seen here. I have appended the license text to Bruce's > email. Please note that the license must stand on its own, since GPL > compatibility is an option, not a requirement. -russ ] -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3