Bjorn Reese scripsit: > The only concern I have about the names is that Free and Open seems > to be switched. The OSL is based on reciprocity, which is usually > associated with Free Software, and the AFL is not, which is usually > associated with Open Source (especially when seen in the light of > RMS's rejection of Open Source.)
Software licensed under non-reciprocal licenses is still free software. Software licensed under reciprocal licenses is still open-source software. The number of licenses where FSF and OSI disagree is very small, and the proportion of software covered by them is even smaller. -- John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.reutershealth.com "Mr. Lane, if you ever wish anything that I can do all you will have to do will be to send me a telegram asking and it will be done." "Mr. Hearst, if you ever get a telegram from me asking you to do anything you can put the telegram down as a forgery." -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3