I agree with you, Lewis. That is selfish of me to say you cannot sell my free software.
I'll take that out of the license right now. I still want to see my license approved because I think there is a need for it. I think it would even serve the needs of Henry Piffers, who just asked a question on the list with similar concerns that I had. I think the Simplified Artistic License serves the needs of the artists who want a simple yet effective open source license. I don't mean to create controversy and I am just going to let this go. I suppose it's not important that my license be approved by OSI. I just wanted it to be because I *do* support open source software, but I suppose me offering my software for free didn't show you that. -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
