Alain =?iso-8859-1?Q?D=E9silets?= scripsit: > But the original licensor of the software did NOT receive the software > under the terms of the AFL. Therefore, he can do what he pleases with > the software, including distribute it under terms other than AFL (even > if he previously distributed it under AFL).
See the 7th paragraph of the AFL, the one headed License to Source Code. -- John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.reutershealth.com www.ccil.org/~cowan Consider the matter of Analytic Philosophy. Dennett and Bennett are well-known. Dennett rarely or never cites Bennett, so Bennett rarely or never cites Dennett. There is also one Dummett. By their works shall ye know them. However, just as no trinities have fourth persons (Zeppo Marx notwithstanding), Bummett is hardly known by his works. Indeed, Bummett does not exist. It is part of the function of this and other e-mail messages, therefore, to do what they can to create him. -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
