Russell Nelson wrote:
I've two questions:I'm going to propose a change the Open Source Definition at our board meeting next Thursday. It is simply this:0) A license may not restrict use or modification of a lawfully obtained copy of a work. Anybody have problems with this? Does this have any problems?
Why this change?
What is really changed by this?
[Somebody can give me some example of real licenses that don't follow
this point? (Bitkeeper's public license?)]
ciao
] giacomo
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3

