David, thanks for you comments and help. Not understanding too much about lawyer, I get easily confused by these issues.
Thanks again, mike --- David Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 27 January 2003 11:33 pm, James Michael DuPont wrote: > > > The cvs does require accepting the license hence my question. > > I think that's because the repository has code under multiple > licenses, one of > which is the APSL. They aren't claiming that everything in that > repository is > under the APSL, only that you need to join an "APSL Club" to see it. > If you > don't join that club, you can get the same GPL code elsewhere on the > same > site. Besides which, implementing a click-through on just parts of a > repository would be a royal pain in the arse. > > > so there is no problem in republishing the sources directly under > the > > gpl? > > If the license says GPL then follow the GPL to your hearts content. > Publish > away. > > -- > David Johnson > ___________________ > http://www.usermode.org > pgp public key on website ===== James Michael DuPont http://introspector.sourceforge.net/ __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
