James Harrell scripsit: > The obvious major issue, is now that another commercial entity (Netscape) > has the authority to subvert the license. Not that they would, but they > could. Not having this section templated (ie: Insert company name here) > is a show stopper. Am I missing something?
If you templated the MPL in this respect and called it the Commercial Open Source License, I suspect it would get past this list and be passed by OSI. (Warning: OSI are a bunch of volunteers and they take time to approve things, even obvious things.) -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To say that Bilbo's breath was taken away is no description at all. There are no words left to express his staggerment, since Men changed the language that they learned of elves in the days when all the world was wonderful. --_The Hobbit_ -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
