Quoting David A. Wheeler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): [a lot of stuff that David's already said, previously]
> 3. It's dreadfully inconsistent. Why would software that completely > meets the entire OSD _not_ be open source software? Your rhetoric is overreaching: Nobody has maintained this. > Hope that helps. In my opinion, not _nearly_ as much would be as a clear, concise written description of the legal category and its salient aspects that would solve more problems than it creates, plus a suggested place to put it (obviously NOT on the page of approved licences). I suspect you'll cease thinking it's a feasible task, once you've tried. -- Cheers, "Linux means never having to delete your love mail." Rick Moen -- Don Marti [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
