----- Original Message ----- From: Chris F Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Me: > > Obviously, item 2 must be under some restrictions, or there isn't any > > "must" in your 3. > > Abe: > --> I do not agree. The main restriction is that you keep your > modifications private. The base line is: either keep them private > *or* distribute to the public. Nothing in between. > > I'm sorry I misunderstood you also, and I apologize if I hijacked your > ideas and took them in a direction you didn't intend for them to go. --> No problem - I kinda like these discussions. > Avoiding "selective" secrecy (keeping modifiers (creators of derived > works) from publishing only to their customers, but not to the world) > is a reasonable goal for one to attempt to achieve in a license. --> Ok, thanks! > I hope that the OSI board finds your license conformant. --> Thank you. > It is still a step in the correct direction in my book. --> Sorry, I don't quite understand this remark of yours. What is the intended meaning in (more) plain english? (I'm not a native speaker and am easily confounded by implied meanings, expressions and the like - but am always willing to learn) Kind regards, Abe. -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3