Mitchell Baker wrote: > The Open Source Applications Foundation > (http://www.osafoundation.org) > is planning the 0.1 release of Chandler (a personal > information manager) > shortly, hopefully by the end of April. OSAF's plan of record for > licensing is to follow the model used by MySQL: recipients > must either > (a) make their entire application available under the GPL or other > approved open source license, or (b) get a commercial license from > OSAF. I'm very interested in the thinking of this group about this > model. The plan is reasonably firm but not set in stone, so I'd > appreciate hearing about potential pitfalls as well as benefits.
I've always liked that model. :-) /Larry Rosen -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
