Thank you very much for the quick replies, that was helpful :-) I will wait for the approval of the original author...
Assert.
Karsten M. Self wrote:
Clause 5 would read far more clearly if "FREEWARE" were defined.
I'd say the terms for distribution are ambiguous, and would avoid the work.
If you're interested in distributing the work, contact the author and express your wish that licensing terms be clarified. GNU GPL, GNU LGPL, BSD, and MIT/X11 are all examples of GPL-compatible licenses.
IANAL, TINLA, YADA.
Peace.
-- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
