--- Wolfram Kleff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > With GPL it would be no problem to distribute such stuff and the > author(s) > have no chance to prevent such distribution! > Please consider that the PSI license is intended for high-security > and > critical software, not for "normal" software.
Dear Wolfram, this sounds like what I am proposing with an alternative solution http://fsedu.org/fsedu.pl?ContentDelivery I dont think that you are right about the GPL, I think you are looking to copyright for a solution for an EULA. You need a stronger agreement to bind all the networked users to single agreed on version of the software for the duration of the transation and a means to audit that software. The gpl is fine for what it does, trying to make that a stronger contract is dangerous. at least in my opinion, I am not a lawyer. mike ===== James Michael DuPont http://introspector.sourceforge.net/ __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
