> > > Your license is fine, once the ambiguities are squeezed out, and > > > I recommend that the OSI approve it. > > > > Are you apart of the approval process? *doesn't remember reading > > that part* > > As an individual, no; as a member of this list, yes.
Ah, ok... didn't know if you had special political power over the OSI review process or not. > > Well, from what I can tell, any conclusion that isn't the GPL > > seems to indicate a flaw in whoever's argumentation. :) -sc > > It so happens that my latest piece of free software was issued under > the Academic Free License. I wound up dual-licensing it under the > GPL because the AFL's patent poison-pill is GPL-incompatible. AFL patent poison-pill? -sc -- Sean Chittenden -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
