> > I know that, but I want people to take bits and make them > > proprietary. More correctly. In my own context, I want to be > > able to use the fruits of my labor. The contributions that I seek > > are from other widget makers using the same tool for their widget. > > In that case, a "community" style license may be more appropriate. > For example Netscape uses (used?) this. All modified releases are to > be publicly available (much like the GPL), but furthermore everyone > who is not Sean Chittenden has to license his modifications to Sean > under arbitrary terms. This allows Sean to do whatever he wants, for > example selling the modifications.
Under the OSSAL, there is no central organization, like there is with the MPL. The OSSAL is much more distributed than the MPL, which is why I like it more than the MPL. [snip] -sc -- Sean Chittenden -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
