Sean Chittenden scripsit: > Right now the members of this list (but > hopefully not the OSI Board) are bent on arguing that OSI and the OSD > is responsible for only permitting licenses that GPL compatible.
Not at all. I think your license is open source, and I said so. Some people think licenses that are ideologically anti-GPL *ought* to be not open source, but nobody can point to a specific OSD that is violated. This is not necessarily conclusive: if the OSI Board thinks a particular license is not open source but doesn't fit under anything in the OSD, it can change the OSD. -- All Norstrilians knew what laughter was: John Cowan it was "pleasurable corrigible malfunction". http://www.reutershealth.com --Cordwainer Smith, _Norstrilia_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
