On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Chris F Clark wrote: > Still, I am interested in other peoples impressions of this argument. > The reason being, I am considering drafting a license which makes > approximately that distinction. It is a license that is viral like > the GPL except that it defines its point of requiring "open sourcing" > of the resulting works the point of derivation rather than the point > of redistribution. That is, one must release an open source copy of the > derived work when one creates such a derived work, not only when one > distributes such a derived work. (There are many details to work out, > which is why I have not submitted it for review.)
So when someone's editing a file each time they write out the file they have to send the result to other people? Or does this have to be done each time the person inserts a character, even if he doesn't write it out? -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
