On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 09:46:13AM -0800, Ernest Prabhakar wrote: > On Oct 29, 2003, at 8:50 PM, Kevin Mack wrote: > > Hello, I'm just trying out the ksh93 package and the FAQ at > > http://www.research.att.com/sw/download says: > > > > "We believe that it conforms to the provisions of the Open > > Source Definitions (OSD), and have submitted the license for > > certification, but we have not heard back." > > > > What's the status? > > Has AT&T posted their license to this list for discussion? I don't > remember seeing it. I thought that this list was required to review it > before approval. > > Also, is there an online version of their license somewhere? I wonder > if its been cleaned up since the previous version I saw, and I'd rather > not have to download their stuff without first seeing the license. > Their "licenses" page just says there's lots of licenses, but doesn't > even tell if you if there is a single AT&T license. > > -- Ernie P. >
At http://www.research.att.com/sw/download I found a link to this PDF: http://www.research.att.com/~gsf/publications/open-2000-1.pdf In the appendix is version 1.2D of the "AT&T AST OpenSource Source Code Agreement". It appears to be the same as the one at: http://www.research.att.com/sw/license/ast-open.html and in the package I downloaded. (from http://www.research.att.com/~gsf/download/tgz/ast-base.2003-07-24.tgz) Kevin -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
