I agree that open source must win this thing, but thinking like a lawyer matters too...no need to chase false hopes or expend resources hopelessly. Those who think SCO's counsel can be "forced" to "testify as a witness" merely because he is being paid quite well for his firm's services (the arrangement, itself, does not strike me as unusual) are chasing false hopes. SCO's case does not warrant that level of fear in my opinion.
-Rod Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M. Author: Open Source Software Law Blog: http://opensource.cyberspaces.org e-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] website: http://cyberspaces.org/dixon/ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Karsten M. Self" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'License Discuss'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 9:11 PM Subject: Re: OFF-TOPIC - The SCO suit -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
