Scott Long scripsit: > I also feel that a person shouldn't be made to read kilobytes of text > in order to understand the license agreement. Therefore, the brevity > and clarity of the license is also a factor. (This also has to do with > my ability to understand my own license, because legal language causes > my eyes to glaze rather rapidly.)
Notwithstanding this point, I think you should at least consider the Academic Free License, because of its protection against patent poison pills. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Any legal document draws most of its meaning from context. A telegram that says 'SELL HUNDRED THOUSAND SHARES IBM SHORT' (only 190 bits in 5-bit Baudot code plus appropriate headers) is as good a legal document as any, even sans digital signature." --me -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
