Quoting Alex Rousskov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > I believe the context implies that such a declaration is believed to > be legally effective.
You can believe that, but, from inquiries so far, it is not clear Creative Common does. The matter, indeed, appears to occasion some controversy. > Again, by the very nature of legal law, no case and no set of cases > can guarantee a single interpretation of the current law or that the > current law will not change (sometimes retroactively!). Clearly. To review: I was answering the assertion that open-source licensing has never been tested in court. -- Cheers, find / -user your -name base -print | xargs chown us:us Rick Moen [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3