Richard Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Specifically, I maintain that copyright and waivers are *not* > determinants of an open source license, and I think it's improtant (if > that's opensource.org criteria as well) to clearly state that. I > would also suggest that as long as distribution is met, regardless of > it's means, with or without re-distribution, the license be considered > open source.
Well, no. The OSD imposes additional requirements, and they are generally considered to be desirable. If you want to propose a modification to the OSD, try proposing specific changes. Ian -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
