Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > http://www.atnf.csiro.au/people/rgooch/linux/docs/licensing.txt > http://google.com/groups?threadm=YPep.5Y5.21%40gated-at.bofh.it > (Read the entire thread -- this is real fun ;-) )
I am already quite familiar with this discussion. In your initial post, you mentioned glibc. glibc is not a kernel loadable module. It only uses the Linux kernel syscall interface. The discussions you mention above do not apply to glibc. In fact, I believe that those discussions support my initial point, which is that there is no clear legal position for software which uses an API which is only defined by a single GPL implementation. Ian -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
