Think of it this way:  There's a default licence (absent an explicit
        licence statement) that is implicit in copyright law.  Copyright law
        grants to lawful recipients the right to compile and the right to use --
        but not the right to create derivative works or redistribute.[1]

Do you say the law prevents me from taking a legal copy of a copyrighted
work, which is a program, and privately modifying that program for my own use?

Wouldn't that be a bit like owning a legal copy of copyrighted music,
but not having the right to change any of the notes?  Or buying a magazine
but having the right to remove any of the pages or to add it to a scrapbook?

Is software treated specially in copyright law?

Surprised,

Stephen North

--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3

Reply via email to