Sorry, I missed that it wasn't intended for submission.
The author should back up and state a /list of goals, /rather than present the argument as pseudo-legal drafting.
Thanks
Bruce
On 12/16/2011 10:23 PM, Karl Fogel wrote:
> It was never submitted -- I don't think Clark intended to, in fact.
<<attachment: bruce.vcf>>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
