Richard Fontana <rfont...@redhat.com> writes: >That sums it up pretty well. The ~70-license OSI list will give anyone >new to open source a rather distorted view of FOSS licensing. For >example, and the part that bothers me the most, there is an >overrepresentation of mostly-obsolete licenses that I would describe >as monuments to the excesses of the open source bubble years, a few of >which even fail to meet any reasonable contemporary definition of >"open source".
We're working on fixing those presentation problems; see http://projects.opensource.org/redmine/issues/4 _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
