Richard Fontana <rfont...@redhat.com> writes: >Yes, but I'd have to dig the details up since the review of these >licenses took place in (I believe) 2008. I've been meaning to do that >anyway, and to publish the rationale. In at least one case (OCLC-2.0) >at least one issue involved restrictions on commercial use.
I don't see those restrictions in OCLC-2.0, but maybe I'm missing something. If you happen to remember the clause, please post here; no worries if you don't have time to dig it up though. Best, -Karl _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
