You might even be right, but at the moment there are many attorneys less sanguine than you on this issue, and /much/ less emotional.

The prudent consultant advises his customers on how to stay /far/ away from these issues, since there is no technical reason they can't do so. The prudent consultant's goal is not to cast "naah-naah's" at the GPL, nor to be an inch over the line on the right side of the law, but so clearly in compliance that the prospect of litigation over a GPL violation is remote. Again, no technical reason prevents this.

License-discuss mailing list

Reply via email to