On 03/09/2012 11:41 AM, Rick Moen wrote:
As an afterthought, OSI _might_ decide to adopt a policy that all new licences should at least not disclaim/waive any implicit patent waiver that might be created against patents held by licensor (estoppel defence) -- or establish some other minimum requirement on that subject.
...
If OSI elects to impose such a minimum requirement, it wouldn't necessarily need to amend OSD, but rather could find that OSD#2 implies it.
In other words, do what has previously been done, but consistently.
Thanks
Bruce
<<attachment: bruce.vcf>>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
