"Lawrence Rosen" <lro...@rosenlaw.com> writes: >Indeed, my internal wayback machine can assure you that all were >approved by the OSI board.
Heh, good to have that confirmation. >I previously requested that the earlier versions of those licenses be >deprecated. There is probably still software in the wild under those >early license versions, and it is still open source! But I recommend >that people use AFL/OSL/NOSL 3.0. These most recent versions of the >license are in widespread use already. Yes. We have a general "express deprecation better" issue to deal with, and part of the solution is that every page we have about a deprecated license should recommend using the newest version instead. I think those old versions *are* effectively deprecated, it's just that we don't express that clearly anywhere. -K _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
