On 06/05/2012 09:22 AM, Lawrence Rosen wrote:
If MPL 2.0 was applied to Mozilla foundation software, it would immediately qualify as "popular, widely used, or have strong communities".[I’ll add something now about MPL 2.0: It was submitted for approval in early December of last year and approved within a few months, as it should have been; it is a good license. Yet it appears already on the list of OSI-approved licenses” as “popular, widely used, or have strong communities.” Is it because there are defenders of the MPL 2.0 on the OSI board? Is that honest, fair, unbiased and legitimate?]
There are some absolutely horrid licenses that have strong communities. A certain font license comes to mind.
<<attachment: bruce.vcf>>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss